Insights

Perspectives on economics and finances with GFD

The Russian Stock Market Before the Revolution

Global Financial Data has put together indices of the St. Petersburg Stock Exchange before World War I and the collapse of Russia into Communism. The data was made available to us from Yale’s International Center for Finance. The files were marked in transliterated Cyrillic, so we converted the names back into Cyrillic and then translated the names of the companies into English. We then classified the stocks according to their sector so we could see how one sector did relative to the others. Although the data from Yale was rich in price data, it was lacking in shares outstanding and dividends. The source material that Yale collected only had information on capitalization in the first issue. None of the other issues provided any information on either capitalization or shares outstanding. Except for a few issues around 1900, no data on dividends was available either, and having dividend data for four or five years was hardly sufficient to create a useful total return series.  

Common Stock and Scrip

Every stock market has its own peculiarities and one of the interesting facts about the St. Petersburg Stock Exchange is that over time, banks, railroads and other firms raised more capital by issuing new shares as in any other country; however, the newly issued shares traded alongside the original shares. All of the issues would trade simultaneously on the St. Petersburg Stock Exchange, even though the price of each was virtually the same. The St. Petersburg-Tula Land Bank had 15 issues trading simultaneously, the Don Land Bank 14 and the Bessarabsko-Tavrichesky Land bank 19. In all, there were over 150 issues of scrip that traded alongside the mother shares for each company. Once these issues were designated as scrip, rather than common shares, this left about 425 different companies that traded on the St. Petersburg Stock Exchange between 1865 and 1917, some for a few months, some for the entire 52 years. The St. Petersburg Stock Exchange shut down in August 1914 when World War I began, briefly reopened in 1917, then shut down for the next 75 years when the Russian Revolution began. The goal of organizing this data was to produce indices which could be used to analyze the Russian stock market. The source material from Yale principally relied upon St. Petersburg, but quotes from the Moscow, Kiev and Warsaw exchanges were provided as well. Of course, before World War I, the Russian Empire included not only Russia, but the Baltic states, Poland, and Ukraine. The principal industries were banks and railroads with oil companies, utilities, mining, insurance and iron and steel companies providing most of the capitalization. Russia tried to follow Germany’s lead by infusing capital into the banks and railroads to enable the country to industrialize. The railroads relied heavily on bonds as well as common stocks to raise capital for a network of railroads to crisscross the empire. Russia also relied extensively on infusions of capital from Germany, France and Britain to fund the country’s transformation. Of course, when the Communists took power, all the shares became worthless, though foreign-listed companies continued to trade in Paris and Berlin until the 1920s.  

Creating Indices

Our first step was to create a Russian index that included all the companies that traded in St. Petersburg, an All-Share index, but we also wanted to create an index of Russian “blue chip” stocks. We did this by finding the 50 stocks with the largest number of months traded and created an index of the 50 top companies. Because we had no data on shares outstanding, the index had to be equal-weighted meaning that a small cotton factory had the same weight as the largest railroad or bank in the country. To try and address this issue, we collected capitalization data from two stock exchanges where Russian shares also traded, in Paris and in Berlin. We were able to collect data on 68 companies that listed in St. Petersburg and abroad. Of course, the primary companies that listed abroad were the larger blue-chip companies. When we summed up the capitalization of these companies in 1913, it came to $982 million (1910 million Rubles). Our 1900 figure of $486 million is about one-third of the estimate made by Leslie Hannah. The three main sectors in 1913 were railroads (40%), finance (38%) and energy (14%).

 

   

Figure 1. Market Cap of Russian Industries in 1913 in US Dollars

               The final question that remained was what the total return was to investors, including dividends that were paid out.  We were able to obtain dividend data for most of the companies back to 1885.  Before 1885, we turned to the Berlin Stock Exchange yearbook which had data on Russian companies that listed in Berlin.  Since dividend data was only available on a limited number of companies before 1885, the total return indices before 1885 are not reliable.  After 1885, sufficient data is available. The dividend yield for the Russian market is between 4% and 5% which is comparable to the yield in other countries. Some of the railroads paid no dividend so this helped to pull down the average dividend yield.

Russian Stock Price Indices

               Below is a graph that compares the two indices that we calculated for Russia between 1865 and 1914. We calculated indices for both the 68 stocks for whom we were able to find share outstanding data (GFRUSMPM) and the equal-weighted 50 Blue Chip stock index (GFRUS50EPM). Although the actual returns vary over time, the two indices follow the same behavior and provide very similar returns. 

Both Indices surged between 1865 and 1870, stabilized between 1870 and 1875, had a sustained bull market from 1875 until 1895, then followed a steady decline between 1895 and 1907.  Russia went through a financial crisis between 1899 and 1902 and this is shown in the decline in the index during those years. The war between Japan and Russia occurred February 1904 and September 1905 and the Russian Revolution, in response to Russia’s defeat, occurred between January of 1905 and June of 1907. After the Tsar responded to some of the demands made during the Revolution, establishing a state duma and enacting a new Russian constitution in 1906, the economy stabilized and began to recover. The indices recovered and rose dramatically between 1908 and 1914 reaching new highs by the time that World War I began.

 

Russian Stock Return Indices

               The return indices for the Cap-Weighted and the 50 Blue Chip indices are provided in Figure 3.  The equal-weighted index outperforms the Cap-weighted index, as would be expected.  Small cap stocks are generally more volatile than large-cap stocks and tend to provide higher returns. Nevertheless, the two indices follow a similar pattern over time, rising between 1885 and 1895, making no progress between 1895 and 1908, then rising again between 1908 and 1914.

We have calculated returns for Russia between 1865 and 1914.  We used the cap-weighted index for our calculations and divided the data into the period between 1865 and 1914 and the period between 1885 and 1914 when dividend data were available. Between 1864 and 1914, the price of Russian stocks rose by 3.06% per annum, the stock return index rose by 6.73% providing a dividend yield of 3.56%.  Russian government bonds returned 3.54% per annum.

Between 1884 and 1914, Russian stocks rose 1.05% in price, reflecting the difficulties created by the Russian Financial Crisis of 1899-1902, the Russo-Japanese War and the Russian Revolution of 1905.  However, since the dividend data are more complete, the return index provided a 6.44% return per annum and a dividend yield of 5.33%.  Russian government bonds returned 1.78% per annum between 1884 and 1914.  Data on returns to stocks and bonds by decade, using the cap-weighted index are provided in Table 1.

Years

Stock Price

Stock Return

Dividend

Bond Return

1869-1879

4.55

5.85

1.24

5.58

1879-1889

-0.29

2.4

2.7

8.45

1889-1899

3.07

7.98

4.76

5.83

1899-1909

-1.34

3.53

4.94

3.09

1909-1914

4.64

13.73

8.68

2.47

1864-1914

3.06

6.73

3.56

5.58

1884-1914

1.05

6.44

5.34

5.14

Table 1.  Returns to Stocks and Bonds in Russia, 1864 to 1914

The St. Petersburg stock exchange closed in July 1914 and didn’t reopen until 1917.  The exchange was open in January and February 1917, but closed when the Russian Revolution began.  The stock exchange never reopened.  Although Russian stocks traded in Paris for over a decade after the Russian Revolution, Russian shareholders lost everything. 

Russian Sectors

If you study the different sectors, you’ll see that the Bank Index (Black line) never recovered to the 1895 peak, even by 1914. The Railroad (green line) and energy sectors (blue line), however, moved up significantly. Between 1865 and 1905, Russian Railroads made no progress, but between 1905 and 1912, the railroads more than tripled in price. The best performance came from the oil and gas industry which made significant gains in the 1890s and the 1910s. Since the cap-weighted index included more railroad and energy shares than the St. Petersburg stock market in general, this provides the best explanation for the outperformance of the cap-weighted indices over the equal-weighted indices.

 

   

Russia and the United States

Finally, a comparison was made between the total return to shareholders in the United States and in Russia between 1870 and 1914. Previous comparisons showed that the Russian index had outperformed the American index, but this only compared the prices of the stocks and excluded the dividends that were paid. Russian stocks advanced more in price than American stocks between 1864 and 1914, but American companies paid larger dividends. Price and dividends offset each other and during that 45-year period, the two stock markets provided approximately equal returns. The American and Russian stock markets are compared below.

 

Conclusion

The result is as complete of a picture of the Russian Stock Exchange before World War I as currently exists. To our knowledge, no one else has generated either a cap-weighted or a total return index for Russia before World War I. We hope we can get more data on shares outstanding and on dividends in the near future. Of course, by 1918, all of the Russian shares were worthless, but in the meantime, these numbers will have to stand as the best that are available for Russia before the Revolution.

How Old Is this Bull Market? 2 years or 9 Years?

Much is being made about the fact that the bull market is marking its ninth anniversary today. The bear market of the Great Recession hit its bottom on March 9, 2009 and has steadily moved up since then, especially in the United States. The bump we hit in February 2018 is now ancient history. Naturally, most market analysts refer to this as an old bull market since it has been moving steadily upward for the past nine years. But how old is it? Yes, the United States stock market hasn’t had a 20% correction, or even a 15% correction since 2009, but that is not true of the rest of the world. If you look at both the MSCI Europe Asia and Far East (EAFE) index which includes all developed countries except the United States, and the MSCI Emerging Market Index, these two global indices finished a bear market on February 11, 2016, declining from the peaks of July 2014. A second low was hit in July 2016 and it has been off to the races since then.

This fact is confirmed by GFD’s Indicator of global bull and bear markets which sums the number of bull and bear markets that begin or end in each year. This indicator which covers over 100 years of global stock market data hit its highest number of bear markets since 2009 in 2016. The United States stock market did not participate in the global bear market that stocks endured between July 2014 and February 2016. During that period of time, the United States stock market treaded water, moving sideways rather than falling into a bear market as most of the rest of the world did. We are of the opinion that we are not in the ninth year of a bull market, but only in the second year and that the current bull market is likely to push forward for the rest of the decade. While the 2009 to 2016 market cycle was driven by exceptionally low interest rates, this will not be true in the market cycle that has begun. This market will be more like bull markets of the past because interest rates will rise, not only in the United States, but in Europe, and sometime in the 2020s we are likely to suffer another bear market. We have two years under our belt, and global stock markets are all moving up together. We probably at least two more years to go. So enjoy the next two years of growth in the global stock market.

The Communications Revolution

Global Financial Data has reorganized its sector and industry classification system to make Communications a separate sector. The introduction of the internet 25 years ago has transformed the world and will continue to change the global economy in ways we still cannot predict. Many services which formerly were provided through brick and mortar stores are now provided online. Businesses which formerly were included in Consumer Discretionary, such as Media and Broadcasting or the Internet in Information Technology have more in common with each other than was formerly realized. A company such as Amazon not only has a huge retail business, but also hosts huge amounts of data on the cloud and provides streaming services for video and music. Netflix not only rents and streams video, but produces its own movies and series, as does Amazon. These changes have caused a re-evaluation of the classification system of industries and sectors by all of the index providers.
Global Financial Data’s classification system is based upon 12 sectors and 72 industries. While most other providers have Sectors and Sub-Sectors, Industries and Sub-Industries, we keep it simple and limit our system to Sectors for the whole economy and the industries that make them up. GFD’s sectors differ from other index providers because we keep Transportation as a sector rather than making it part of the Industrials as other providers do. GFD focuses on sectors and industries that have existed over the past 200 years, not just the ones that exist today. The Transportation sector laid the foundations of the stock market back in the 1800s and deserves to be recognized for this as a separate sector. While other index providers periodically rejig their classification system to adjust to new trends in the market and investing, Global Financial Data has created a timeless system that covers over two centuries of sector classification and recognizes industries that no longer exist. Canals and Docks have their own industry because that industry dominated the stock market in England in the early 1800s. Telegraphs, Cables and Express were all important industries in the 1800s, but no longer exist. We don’t delete industries that economic change has eliminated.  

 
GFD’s goal is to create a sector and industry classification that reflects not only the present, but the past, to help its subscribers to analyze the market and determine which sectors and industries outperformed or underperformed the market today or 200 years ago. After all, finding the high alpha stocks and why they had a high alpha is the whole point of analyzing the past. The Communications Sector has been broken up into several industries. The components of the Communications Sector are Advertising, Broadcasting, Entertainment, Publishing, Internet, Telegraph Cable & Express, Telephones and Retail – Internet and Media. By making these changes, Communications becomes the second largest sector in the United States after Finance, in part because several of the largest companies in the world, Alphabet, Facebook, Amazon and others are now part of the Communications sector. If you look at only the Telecommunications sector, it represents 4.69% of the total market cap, but the Communications sector represents 12.53%. GFD will revise the historical data for all of our GFD Indices to reflect these changes. Our Communications Sector Index is a Communications sector index from the 1800s to the 2000s. Other index providers will introduce these changes this year and keep their old indices as they were. S&P’s Communications sector will actually be a Telecommunications sector through 2018 and a Communications sector after that. The reason is the recalculation would affect not only the historical data for Communications, but for Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology as well. Only GFD’s Communications Sector provides true Communications 150 years of true Communications data back to its beginning. The Communications Revolution has transformed the world and now it is transforming stock market indices. To follow the path of changes in Communications over the past 150 years, GFD’s sector capitalization tool provides the perfect means of analyzing these changes. Welcome to the communications revolution.

The Risk-Free Rate in the United States in the Nineteenth Century

The Risk-Free Rate of Return is an important concept in financial markets since it provides the return an investor can receive on his money without running any risk of loss. Typically, the rate of return is measured by the one-month treasury bill issued by the government. But what happens when there are no Treasury bills to measure the risk-free rate of return? Investors in government bonds have found out that government bonds are not risk free, even if there is virtually no risk of default, because the price of the bond produces capital gains and losses to bondholders. The longer the maturity of the bond, the greater the change in the price of the bond whenever bond yields change. Treasury bills, on the other hand, are redeemed within a month at their face value, and short of a default, there is no risk of loss due to capital gains or losses. But what if there are no Treasury bills, as was generally the case in the 1800s, that investors can use for a risk-free investment? One alternative is the interest rate the central bank pays on deposits with the bank. England has had a central bank beginning in 1694 and this rate enables historians to provide a risk-free rate of return in Great Britain for over 300 years.
But what if there is no central bank and no treasury bills? This is the situation that the United States faced between 1836 and 1913 when the Federal Reserve was established and before 1918 when the Federal government began issuing treasury bills to cover its borrowing needs. Unlike most European countries, the United States almost managed to pay off its debt before World War I commenced. The easiest solution would be to use commercial paper as a substitute for Treasury bills. Since the risk of the issuing bank defaulting is low and the bills’ maturity is only a month or two, they would seem to be the best substitute for Treasury Bills. The problem with this solution is that when you calculate the rate of return over time, before 1918, commercial bills provided a higher return than Government bonds! When we put together a risk-free bill series to compare with Government bonds in the United States between 1835 and 2017, we found that the bills outperformed the government bonds until World War I when treasury bills were introduced and bonds outperformed bills between 1918 and 2018. Clearly, this was not a solution. There were periods of time in the nineteenth century when commercial bills paid lower returns than government bonds, and there were periods when they paid higher returns. The solution seemed simple, use the coupon rate on government bonds as the basis for the risk-free rate of return, but during those periods when commercial bills paid a lower yield than government bonds, use commercial bills. This solution worked! Risk-free bills provided a lower rate of return than risk-free government bonds and the balance between bills and bonds was restored.

REQUEST A DEMO with a GFDFinaeon Specialist

Please type your first name.
Please type your last name.
Please type your phone number in the following format 123-456-7890
Invalid email address.
Please type your company name.
Invalid Input
Image

Information

Our comprehensive financial databases span global markets offering data never compiled into an electronic format. We create and generate our own proprietary data series while we continue to investigate new sources and extend existing series whenever possible. GFD supports full data transparency to enable our users to verify financial data points, tracing them back to the original source documents. GFD is the original supplier of complete historical data.